High, moderate, and low fire risk was estimated for each CVS plot
in the simulation dataset based on the Severe Crowning Index assessment
from the Potential Fire Report produced by FFE. The Crowning Index
indicates the estimated wind speed in miles per hour (mph) at 20
feet off the ground that would initiate an active crown fire assuming
ignition of a surface fire. Assumptions required by the model include
a temperature of 70 degrees Fahrenheit and 'very dry' moisture conditions
(Crookston et al. 2002). Results from the crowning index estimates
for each stand were sorted into one of three risk classes. Lower
wind speeds indicate greater risk. If the crowning index was less
than or equal to 25 mph, then the plot was considered to be in the
high fire risk category. Moderate risk stands were those with a
Severe Crowning Index of 25 through 50 mph. Low fire risk stands
were those with a crowning index greater than 50 mph. Very young
or clearcut stands function outside of the range of the model and
subsequently record Severe Crowning Indices less than zero. To accommodate
this model behavior, stands with a crowning index below zero are
classed as low risk.
It should be noted that risk classifications are arbitrary thresholds
useful and necessary for comparative analysis but that they may
very well understate the risk at the margins. The word moderate
properly segments a risk difference between high and low although
the risk of a fire from wind speeds only slightly higher than 25
MPH might not be considered a moderate risk by many publics. It
is in part for this reason that performance comparisons for treatment
alternatives were reported in this investigation for high and moderate
as separate risk classes and then combined as the total area to
be considered for risk reduction treatments.
The initial 1995 fire risk distribution for the Fremont and Okanogan
National Forests was reported as the percentage of CVS plots in
each of the fire risk categories prior to any treatment or growth
simulation. Fire risk distribution was similarly reported for projected
and treated plot inventories at each growth cycle. For purposes
of simulations to demonstrate comparisons between treatment alternatives
only the plots with high and moderate initial classification were
treated. Low risk areas did not receive treatment simulations since
treatments of low risk areas would logically be considered unnecessary
or of low priority. While some low risk areas may experience increases
in risk over time most low risk areas appear to be either very young
small diameter forests or rangeland/forest interface with sparse
distributions of forest inventories that are unlikely to require
fuels reductions at the time of this study.
Okanogan - High &
Moderate Risk Stands: Wildlife HSI with Regeneration
Okanogan - High &
Moderate Risk Stands: Wildlife Source Habitat without Regeneration
Okanogan - High &
Moderate Risk Stands: Wildlife Source Habitat with Regeneration
Okanogan - High &
Moderate Risk Stands: Wildlife Source Habitat without Regeneration
Okanogan - High &
Moderate Risk Stands: Wildlife Source Habitat with Regeneration
Okanogan
- High & Moderate Stands: Source Habitat (ICBEMP) Classification
without Regeneration
Okanogan
- High & Moderate Stands: Source Habitat (ICBEMP) Classification
with Regeneration
Okanogan
- High Risk Stands: Wildlife HSI without Regeneration
Okanogan
- High Risk Stands: Wildlife HSI with Regeneration
Okanogan
- High Risk Stands: Wildlife Source Habitat without Regeneration
Okanogan
- High Risk Stands: Wildlife Source Habitat with Regeneration
Okanogan
- High Risk Stands: Wildlife Source Habitat without Regeneration
Okanogan
- High Risk Stands: Wildlife Source Habitat with Regeneration
Okanogan
- High Risk Stands: Source Habitat (ICBEMP) Classification without
Regeneration
Okanogan
- High Risk Stands: Source Habitat (ICBEMP) Classification with
Regeneration
Okanogan
- Moderate Risk Stands: Wildlife HSI without Regeneration
Okanogan
- Moderate Risk Stands: Wildlife HSI with Regeneration
Okanogan
- Moderate Risk Stands: Wildlife CRB1 without Regeneration
Okanogan
- Moderate Risk Stands: Wildlife Source Habitat with Regeneration
Okanogan
- Moderate Risk Stands: Wildlife Source Habitat without Regeneration
Okanogan
- Moderate Risk Stands: Wildlife Source Habitat with Regeneration
Okanogan
- Moderate Risk Stands: Source Habitat (ICBEMP) Classification
without Regeneration
Okanogan
- Moderate Risk Stands: Source Habitat (ICBEMP) Classification
with Regeneration
Okanogan
- High & Moderate Risk Stands: Carbon without regeneration
Okanogan
- High & Moderate Risk Stands: Carbon with regeneration
Okanogan
- High Risk Stands: Carbon without regeneration
Okanogan
- High Risk Stands: Carbon with regeneration
Okanogan
- Moderate Risk Stands: Carbon without regeneration
Okanogan
- Moderate Risk Stands: Carbon with regeneration
APPENDIX D. WILDLIFE MODELS
LIST OF EQUATIONS AND FIGURES
Habitat Suitability Indices
(HSI)
USDI Fish and Wildlife Service
Northern Goshawk
Nesting Habitat Model - Okanogan and Fremont National Forests
VARIABLE 1 (Fremont only):
Aspect (ASP) SI =
If 0 <= ASP < 90° , or 270° < ASP <= 360,
then = 1
Else = 0.5
VARIABLE 2:
Okanogan: Basal Area (BA) SI =
If BA >= 240, then = 1
If 80 <= BA < 240, then = (0.0063*BA) - 0.5
Else = 0.0
Fremont:
Basal Area (BA) SI =
If BA >= 220, then = 1
If 60 <= BA < 220, then = (0.0063*BA) - 0.375
Else = 0.0
VARIABLE 3:
Quadratic Mean Diameter (QMD) SI =
If QMD >=16, then = 1
If 4 <=QMD < 16, then = (0.0833*QMD) - 0.3333
Else = 0.0
OKANOGAN
MODEL:
HSI = (V2 x V3)1/2
FREMONT
MODEL:
HSI = (V1 x V2 x V3)1/3
Lewis' Woodpecker HSI Model
(Modified From Original USFWS Model) - Okanogan and Fremont
National Forests
VARIABLE 1:
Canopy Cover (CC) SI =
If CC < 30, then = 1
If 30 <= CC < 75, then = -(0.0222*CC) + 1.6667
Else = 0.0
VARIABLE 2:
*Snag Density (SNAGS) SI =
If SNAGS >= 1, then = 1
If SNAGS < 1, then = SNAGS
* Number of snags (SNAGS) >= 12 inches dbh and
>= 30 feet tall per acre
HSI
MODEL:
HSI = MIN(V1;V2)
NOTE: The original
USFWS model (Sousa 1982) included 'percent shrub cover' as a variable.
LMS does not have the ability to project shrub cover over time
so this variable was removed from the model. In general, percent
shrub cover is inversely related to canopy cover therefore an
assumption was made that a shrub cover variable was not mandatory
in this model given that canopy cover is included.
White-Headed Woodpecker HSI
Model - Okanogan and Fremont National Forests
VARIABLE 1:
Aspect (ASP) SI =
If 90° <= ASP <= 270° , then = 1
Else = 0.5
VARIABLE 2:
Canopy Cover (CC) SI =
If CC <= 60, then = 1
If 60 < CC < 70, then = -(0.1*CC) + 7.0
Else = 0.0
VARIABLE 3:
*Snag Density (SNAGS) SI =
If SNAGS >= 1, then = 1
If SNAGS < 1, then = SNAGS
* Number of snags (SNAGS) >= 18
inches dbh per acre; no minimum height requirement for White-headed
Woodpecker.
VARIABLE 4:
**Large PIPO Density (PIPO) SI =
If PIPO >= 30, then = 1
If PIPO < 30, then = (0.0267*PIPO) + 0.2
** Number of PIPO >= 14 inches
dbh per acre
VARIABLE 5:
Number of ***pine species (PINUS) present SI =
If PINUS >1, then = 1
If PINUS = 1, then = 0.7
If PINUS = 0, then = 0.2
*** Excluding PICO
HSI
MODEL:
HSI = (V1 x V2 x V3 x V43 x V5) 1/7
Williamson's Sapsucker HSI
Model (Modified From Original USFWS Model) - Okanogan and
Fremont National Forests
VARIABLE 1:
Canopy Cover (CC) SI =
If 30 <= CC <= 60, then = 1
If 15 < CC < 30, then = (0.0667*CC) - 1.0
If 60 < CC < 80, then = -(0.05*CC) + 4.0
Else = 0.0
VARIABLE 2:
*Snag Density (SNAGS) SI =
If SNAGS >= 1.5, then = 1
If SNAGS < 1.5, then = 0.6667*SNAGS
* Number of "suitable soft snags"
(SNAGS) >= 12 inches dbh (18 inches for PIPO) and >= 15
feet tall per acre
HSI
MODEL:
HSI = (V1 x V2) 1/2
NOTE: The original
USFWS model (Sousa 1983) included two aspen variables (percent
of area composed of aspen, average DBH of overstory aspen trees).
However, use of aspen for nesting is almost exclusively seen in
the Rocky Mountains - with conifers being more common in the Pacific
Northwest (Crockett 1975, Sousa 1983). Therefore, the aspen variables
were removed from the model.
Species Source Habitat
Matrices
USDA Forest Service
Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management Project (ICBEMP)
Structural stages defined for assessing
the structural features of macrovegetation across the interior
Columbia basin, as adapted from Hann et al. (1997). |
For assessments in this investigation, it is assumed
that all young forest - multi-story stands fall into the managed
young forest - multi-story classification due to past, or proposed
future, management activities.
APPENDIX E. EQUIPMENT INVESTMENT
AND OPERATIONS COSTS