2002
By Larry Mason
Save
or Print a PDF copy of Fact Sheet #07
In 1989, federal judge, William Dwyer, granted
an injunction that brought the harvest of federal forests west
of the Cascade Mountains to a halt. The "Spotted Owl Wars"
had begun. In an area where timber had been the largest industry
for more than one hundred years, mills started closing. From
1989-1993, with the injunction in effect, 242 mills closed and
30,000 mill and wood industry jobs were lost in the northwest.
In 1993, President Clinton launched his Northwest Forest Plan
with assurances of sustainable harvest from federal forests
in the region. But by 2000, mill closures increased by 3-fold
and the number of jobs lost doubled (Paul F. Ehinger & Associates,
Eugene, Oregon). The mills that survived retooled for small
diameter logs available from the commercial thinnings and second
growth harvests occurring largely on private industrial forests.
Today few mills want to purchase logs much over 20 inches in
diameter. This fact sheet offers a cursory examination of how
Douglas-fir log price adjustments in the Puget Sound area over
this period (1989-2001) have influenced present value calculations
and may contribute to forest management decisions that shorten
rotation ages. |
|
In 1989, Log Lines, a log price reporting service in Mount Vernon,
WA, reported average domestic Douglas-fir log prices for the year
by grade for the Puget Sound region. In a similar report in October
of 2001, Log Lines again issued prices. A notable difference is that
in 2001 no prices are reported for the higher-grade larger logs in
the Puget Sound region. 2001 price reports come at a time when small
forest landowners are reporting difficultly selling larger diameter
logs. To compare such pricing differences, it is necessary to account
for adjustments in the economy such as inflation. In other words,
the 1989 prices need to be converted to 2001 dollars.
Figure 1. Log Prices 1989, 1989 adjusted, and 2001
|
This is accomplished by adjusting
the 1989 grade prices proportionally to a price anchor of a
#2 saw log in 2001. The table (Figure. 1.) displays the 1989
listed prices by grade, the 1989 prices adjusted to the 2001
# 2 saw log price, and the 2001 listed prices by grade. For
this evaluation the 2001 # 2 saw log price is assigned to the
higher grades for that year. All prices are reported in dollars
per thousand board feet ($/MBF). Undoubtedly more astute log
sellers may find better market opportunities than these local
market prices reflect. For example, price reports from the Willamette
Valley in Oregon indicate that premiums for higher-grade larger
logs are still available in that area. However, these premiums
are $200 to $300 per MBF lower by grade than the prices reflected
by the revised 1989 schedule. Further erosion to premiums results
when Washington log sellers must discount Oregon prices to absorb
transportation costs. |
Another manifestation of shifts in log demand is the increased
relative value of small diameter saw material. Notice that in 2001
not only did large logs lose premium value compared to 1989 but
"chip and saw" increased in value substantially, reflecting
a larger demand for this small saw material in 2001. At the same
time, however, pulp values dropped significantly as paper making
infrastructure in the region declined and world markets in general
appeared oversupplied. The objective of this examination, however,
is not to declare price absolutes but to better understand how policy
driven log shortages over the last twelve years may have caused
adjustments in the manufacturing sector that influence forest management
decisions and investments.
To estimate how price changes influence returns on growing stock
harvested at different rotation ages, a simplified growth simulation
was undertaken for one acre (site index 110) of Douglas-fir planted
to 220/TPA. The forestry software program, the Landscape Management
System (LMS), developed at the University of Washington, was used
in conjunction with the SMC variant of the Organon growth model,
developed at Oregon State University, to "grow" this virtual
forest inventory forward from plantation to 70 years of age. The
charts (figures. 2 & 3.) below display growth as total volume
per acre and as mean and periodic annual increment vs. age. Note
that culmination of periodic annual increment for this growth simulation,
the point at which the annual rate of growth declines, occurs at
age 50.
|
Figure. 2. Volume vs. Age |
Figure. 3. Mean and Periodic
Annual Increment Over Time |
A series of harvest simulations were applied to each five-year
growth increment. The resulting log volumes were sorted by grade
and size and valued by the adjusted 1989 prices and the 2001 prices.
From these tallies a total gross log value/acre/year for all grades
was calculated for both price scenarios. Total returns/acre for
each time interval and pricing scenario were discounted to a present
value using a 6% expected rate of return. Present values are displayed
for 5 yr. increments in Figure 4.
Recalling that the culmination of the periodic annual increment
occurred at 50 years, the present value simulations indicate that
financial returns decline after 45 years with 1989 prices and after
40 years with 2001 prices. Using the 2001 prices, if harvest is
delayed until 60 years there is a 27% loss in present value, and
if harvest is delayed until 70 years there is a 50% loss in present
value relative to the maximum return on 2001 prices (harvest in
40 years).
Figure. 4. Present Value vs. Rotation
Age.
Conclusion
There has long been an historic debate about what harvest age is
most desirable. Some tree farmers have argued that final harvest
should occur at the culmination of periodic annual increment, in
this case age 50. Others argued that if trees were grown past culmination
of periodic annual increment that losses in earning potential associated
with slowing growth would be compensated by increases in grade and
associated price premiums. This is clearly not the case if premium
prices are not available for large logs. To the contrary, this simulation
could indicate that the market response to log availability changes
over the past twelve years has been a price adjustment that rewards
landowners managing for shorter rotations. Further, with the 2001
price schedule large log premiums disappear but the "chip and
saw" price increases from 54% of a #2 price in 1989 to 82%
of a #2 price in 2001. These market adjustments come against a backdrop
of landowner complaints of fears that if they grow their trees beyond
a certain age or structural condition that governmental restrictions
to protect older forests may impose additional harvest constraints
in the form of habitat set-asides or widened riparian buffers. It
appears that policy changes over the last twelve years, ostensibly
designed to protect older forests, may have inspired market responses
that are likely to result in management decisions that shorten rather
than lengthen harvest rotations on private forestlands in the Douglas-fir
zone of the Pacific Northwest.
|