Table 8-1. Summary of Major Pulping Processes

   
Treatment
   
Relative Strength*
   
Pulp
 
Form of

Process Acronym Chemical Mechanical
Yield (%)
Wood Used
Wood
Softwood Hardwood

Mechanical

         
   

Stone groundwood

SGW

None

Grinder

93-95

Softwood (mostly)

bolts

5

3

Pressure groundwood

PGW

None

Grinder

93-95

 
   

Refiner mechanical

RMP

None

Disk refiner

93-95

Softwood (mostly)

chips

5-6

3

     

      (pressure)

   
   

Thermomechanical

TMP

Steam

Disk refiner

80-90

Softwood

chips

6-7

-

     

      (pressure)

   
   

Chemithermomechanical

CTMP

Sodium sulfite or

Disk refiner

80-90

Hardwood

chips

-

5-6

   

      sodium hydroxidea

      (pressure)

   
   

Chemimechanicalb

CMP

Sodium sulfite or

Disk refiner

80-90

Hardwood

chips

-

5-6

   

      sodium hydroxide

     
   
           
   

Semichemical

         
   

Neutral sulfite

NSSC

Sodium sulfite +

Disk refiner

70-85

Hardwood

chips

-

6

   

      sodium carbonate

     
   

Green liquor

GLSC

Sodium hydroxide +

Disk refiner

70-85

 
   
   

      sodium carbonate

     
   

Nonsulfur

—

Sodium carbonate +

Disk refiner

70-85

 
   
   

      sodium hydroxide

     
   

Chemical

         
   

Kraft

—

Sodium hydroxide +

None

45-55

Both

chips

10

7-8

   

      sodium sulfide

     
   

Sulfite

—

Calcium bisulfite

None

40-50

Both

chips

  9

7

   

      in sulfurous acidc,d

     
   

Magnefite

—

Magnesium bisulfite

None

45-55

 
   
   

      in sulfurous acide

     
   

Soda

—

Sodium hydroxide

None

40-50

Hardwood

chips

—

7-8

      Soda-oxygen

—

Sodium hydroxide +

None

45-55

Hardwood

chips

—

 
   

      oxygen

     
   

      Soda-anthraquinone

SAq

Sodium hydroxide +

None

45-55

 
   
   

      anthraquinone

     
   

Dissolving

         
   

Prehydrolysis kraft

—

Steaming and kraft

None

      35

 
   
   

      (two-step process)

     
   

Acid sulfite

—

Acid sulfite
      (Ca, Na)

None

      35

 
   

Source: Smook (1986), Young et al. (1989)
*
Very "rough" ranking based on full range of pulp strengths